- About Connections
- Latest issue
- Previous issues
- Issue 84 2013
- Issue 83 2012
- Issue 82 2012
- Issue 81 2012
- Issue 80 2012
- Issue 79 2011
- Issue 78 2011
- Issue 77 2011
- Issue 76 2011
- Issue 75 2010
- Issue 74 2010
- Issue 73 2010
- Issue 72 2010
- Issue 71 2009
- Issue 70 2009
- Issue 69 2009
- Issue 68 2009
- FEATURE ARTICLE
- regular features
- print complete issue
- Issue 67 2008
- Issue 66 2008
- Issue 65 2008
- Issue 64 2008
- Issue 63 2007
- Issue 62 2007
- Issue 61 2007
- Issue 60 2007
- Issue 59 2006
- Issue 58 2006
- Issue 57 2006
- Issue 56 2006
Learning NOT to answer their questions
There are many ways to teach information literacy – the formal classroom way, library visits, team and project-based methods, and more. No matter how you define ‘reference work’ today, it likely involves the process of accessing print and electronic sources, understanding a variety of containers (from books and videos to websites and serials), understanding how to ask questions of people in person and virtually through search engines … as well as questions of ourselves. It’s more than just a research skill. True information literacy has emerged as one of the defining life skills of our century. Building citizens who can learn and inform themselves throughout their lives in a new century of predictable massive change is the Holy Grail of our era.
How many types of literacy are there?
- Literacy (the ability to read and write)
- Information literacy (the ability to find, evaluate, and use information)
- Media literacy (the ability to access, analyse, evaluate, and create messages in a variety of forms)
- Digital literacy (the ability to use digital technology, communication tools, or networks to locate, evaluate, use, and create information)
I am a great believer in the power of the teachable moment. In the classroom of programmed teaching goals related to thinking and problem-solving skills, this might mean tying our lessons to local events: elections, autumn leaves, hurricanes, the Olympics, current events, newspaper units and more. No doubt the gift of a space shuttle launch during an astronomy unit or a national election during a politics class truly helps to make the lessons real and tangibly relevant to our students’ views of their lives.
Another emerging fact about the web is that it can more easily and sustainably support a wider range of learning styles than some of our more traditional sources. We’ve long recognised that our learners come with a mosaic of learning styles, most articulately described by Bloom’s taxonomy of learning styles. As early genomic researchers are starting to discover, humans may be predetermined to certain behaviours, including our learning preferences. When they discovered the gene for shyness, the behavioural cat was out of the bag. So now we’re ready to embrace the question ‘space’ of our learners. It’s an exciting time – so many questions, so little time!
Not answering questions
So … what do I mean by the title, ‘Learning NOT to answer their questions’?
The goal of most education is not to install a fact. We want our learners to think. In our modern output-oriented educational pedagogy, we know that mere facts have a very short lifespan.
It means little to promote a specific fact into students’ heads.
- Water boils at 212 degrees Fahrenheit (100 degrees Celsius)? Well, not too often – only perfectly clean, still water that’s at sea level.
- What’s the population of China? Today’s answer won’t be the same as next year’s. Why memorise that?
- The periodic table? It continues to change as new elements are discovered or theorised.
- Columbus sailed the ocean blue in 1492? Nice mnemonic, but he really sailed three times to America, and the answer is at best incomplete.
So, what is the point of giving learners an answer? It merely fills them up with the knowledge nutrition that comprises the life skills they’ll need to be successful adults.
We’ve always used technology to empower our users with the answers to their questions. In the last century, less than a decade ago, we went beyond our walls with tools like the telephone, email, letters, and reference forms to get the best answers to their questions. Indeed many libraries still depend on these tools.
In this century, we have a number of new tools that allow for conversations, such as instant messaging (IM), meebo, Trillian, Chatango, Facebook, Bebo, Skype, MySpace, and more.
What is the major difference in these tools? Well, for one they enliven the Web experience with real people talking to real people. It’s not just text or graphical content. Unlike forms, letters, and emails, these tools model the telephone’s modality – the conversation. What happens in conversations that happens either not at all or far less in text-based tools? The answer is social interaction, emotional content, and clarification. This is very important. We now have the tools that align with the primary mandate of reference work. We can improve the quality of the question in real time. We can return to our roots and enable the reference interview again. We can do what Google and their ilk do very poorly. We can relate to the users’ needs and not just give them an answer that the computer algorithm assumes is right. Hah!
This is exciting. It also requires us to remind ourselves why we exist. We’re not about answers alone. Every interaction with us improves the user. In no environment is this more evident than in school libraries. Each learner can leave every reference transaction a better informed and more capable person. That’s pretty amazing.
The reference relationship
So, we’re imagining the best scenario. We want to put content at the users’ fingertips when they need it. We want to be there when they need it. We want to create intelligent, informed, and competent graduates. And we need to be there when they need us. I admire those librarians who provide reference services through the telephone but mainly offer IM and virtual reference services. Many just target the critical homework hours—3–6 p.m.—though truth be told, the midnight-cramming student is not a myth.
Here’s a scenario: Paul, an eighth grader, messages in with his question on MSN – ‘What’s the population of China?’ It would be so easy for Mary, the media specialist, to give him the answer, but she knows that Paul will be no better for the provision of the fact. She asks Paul where he thinks he’ll find the answer. He answers Google or Wikipedia. She says that’s fine, but is there a better place? Paul remembers his class visit to the library and that the Encyclopaedia Britannica is online on the school library’s website. Mary reminds him that there are also excellent sources on the web on the library pathfinders and recommends the CIA Handbook resource. Wow—in less than four minutes, Paul has answers from several sources and is empowered with new resource-based knowledge. Mary encourages him to question all the sources and theorise about why there are differences in the numbers. For 90 per cent of this transformational reference experience, Paul was not getting the answer he asked for, but he was getting the experience and learning he needed. That’s a far sight better than just ticking off the transactional experience and giving him a number. Paul will go farther for having had this experience.
So, this is exciting. For our questions, especially from K–12 learners, we have a magic moment with every reference transaction to transform our learners for life – for the better! We do this by respecting their real needs, understanding the variety of learning styles, and knowing deeply the literacy skills that we need to endow them with.
When you leave the reference desk, you should leave a better person – informed, empowered, and better skilled. Answers are just the beginning in education. It’s the process that creates the teachable moments.
I once read that a huge proportion (if I remember right, a ratio exceeding 75 per cent) of autobiographies of famous, successful, opinionated people (who else would write an autobiography?) have positive passages of their memories of libraries and librarians’ impact on their lives. As teacher librarians, you have hundreds of moments of truth every week to create these memories.
Don’t answer students’ questions right away. Create memories. Our society depends on you.
The Pipeline, MultiMedia & Internet @ Schools, Posted Nov 1, 2007
Stephen Abram, MLS, is vice president of innovation for SirsiDynix, chief strategist of the SirsiDynix Institute, and the president-elect of SLA. He is an SLA Fellow, the past president of the Ontario Library Association, and the immediate past president of the Canadian Library Association. Stephen is the author of Out Front with Stephen Abram from ALA Editions. Stephen would love to hear from you at email@example.com.
This article was published first by Information Today, Inc. (www.infotoday.com). Used with permission. All rights reserved.